Another pattern writing question

by ysoldateague March 27, 2009

0 Comments

As you’ve probably noticed I like to give a wide range of sizes for my patterns. This is important to me so I’m certainly not going to stop, but it can pose some challenges in presenting a clear pattern. The usual way of writing the numbers for the different sizes “s[m, l, xl]” quickly becomes harder to read the more sizes there are. In the past I’ve split patterns into 2 or 3 size groups each with their own pattern file (Coraline, with 18 sizes presented in 3 different groups is a good example). This works pretty well, but for a few reasons I’d really like a way to include all of the sizes in one document. The pattern I’m working on today provisionally has 14 sizes and I’m considering writing the directions like this:

For the sake of comparison, although I don’t think I’d ever write a pattern with this many sizes like this, here is the same section written normally:

The table is obviously better, but I’m wondering if you like it?

Edit: I agree that shading alternate columns would make it easier to read, but I didn’t do that because when working from the pattern you’ll only care about 1 column and the best thing to do would be to mark the column for your size beforehand.

ysoldateague
ysoldateague



Also in Blog

Inverleith KAL - Working the split hem and binding off
Inverleith KAL - Working the split hem and binding off

by Laura Chau August 16, 2019 0 Comments

Welcome to the Inverleith KAL! After a bit of soothing stockinette in the round, it's time to tackle the split hems and purled bind offs to complete the body of Inverleith.
Read More
Inverleith KAL prizes
Inverleith KAL prizes

by Ysolda Teague August 09, 2019 0 Comments

Finish your Inverleith by the deadline and win great prizes!
Read More
Neighborhood Fiber Co. is Now Available At Ysolda.com
Neighborhood Fiber Co. is Now Available At Ysolda.com

by Ysolda Teague August 04, 2019 0 Comments

Read More

Subscribe